Connect with us

New York Yankees

Gregory | The Yankees’ appearance policy is archaic and should change

Matt Gregory

Published

on

Andy Marlin-USA TODAY Sports

Since 1973, the New York Yankees have had a policy in place that regulates how their players should look. Then-owner George Steinbrenner created the policy after noting several players who had grown their hair so long it was covering their numbers. The official policy states: “All players, coaches and male executives are forbidden to display any facial hair other than mustaches (except for religious reasons), and scalp hair may not be grown below the collar. Long sideburns and ‘mutton chops’ are not specifically banned.” For the last 45 years, the policy has remained.

Back in 2006, Johnny Damon was forced to shed his “Caveman” look when he signed with the Yankees, as did Randy Johnson when he was traded from the Arizona Diamondbacks before the 2005 regular season. Two recent examples, Clint Frazier and Andrew McCutchen, have brought the policy back front and center and has many people asking why this is still a thing and is it time for the Yankees to end the policy?

Steinbrenner apparently wanted the Yankees to adopt a more corporate attitude while being like the military appearance policy, of which Steinbrenner was an Air Force veteran. Players in the past have protested. Famously, Don Mattingly refused to cut his hair during the 1991 season leading the team to bench him and fine him until he agreed to trim his hair.

Lou Piniella was quoted as telling Steinbrenner “I don’t understand, Mr. Steinbrenner, what long hair has to do with your ability to play baseball… I’m a Christian. Our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ had hair down to the middle of his back, and it didn’t affect the way he went about his work.” Steinbrenner responded by telling Piniella that he could wear his hair so long as he wanted if he walked on water across an 8-foot-deep pond.

Back when David Price was still with the Tampa Bay Rays, he said he would never sign with the Yankees if the policy existed. Frazier was forced to answer questions about the policy in 2017, saying “I think people are making my hair bigger than my game, I’m here to play baseball.” McCutchen, who was just traded to this Yankees this past weekend, shaved his face while holding his infant son, because he was worried his son would not recognize him without a beard.

These recent examples are why this policy needs to change. For one, it was issued nearly half a century ago which means it’s archaic and two, allowing players to express themselves and have individuality is a good thing. Having a personality is not a fault, it is a positive trait that should be encouraged, not shuttered.

The policy is authoritarian in nature, as one owner gets to dictate how the players must look and hold the threat of reduced playing time over their heads for something that does not affect performance. It should be mentioned that without these players, whom the Steinbrenners impose this policy on, the Yankees would not exist, nor would they generate the large amount of revenue that the Yankees currently do.

There is historical context for the abolition of the policy as well. Remember how Steinbrenner wanted to adopt a more corporate attitude? Well, in 1993, a Federal appeals court in St. Louis ruled that Domino’s Pizza must waive its ban for black employees who have a common and sometimes painful skin ailment. Domino’s pizza, for reference, is a corporate entity.

The policy was argued to limit employment opportunities for Black men and the courts agreed, given that there would be no impact on their ability to do their job, as Piniella once argued with Steinbrenner.

Despite this, Yankee legend Reggie Jackson defended the policy when Frazier came under fire last Spring. He was quoted explaining, “It’s very important nowadays to maintain some of the older philosophies that we have as people and what we’re trying to teach our youth and kids… some change is good, and as long as you live life there’s going to be change, but there must be a constant. Sustained excellence has a place here, but it’s not easy, so there are some guidelines in doing things the way you’ve always done them to keep up that excellence.”

This continues to feed into the idea that the appearance policy somehow affects performance when it does not. Sustained excellence is always a goal, one that can be achieved by the front office doing things such as not worrying about the luxury tax or by not alienating potential free agents like Price, who want to have their individuality.

So, is it possible to change the policy? Do players have legal options they could pursue like the Domino’s Pizza case? I asked Sheryl Ring, contributor at FanGraphs, general counsel at Open Communities and an attorney, to shed some light on the topic.

Sheryl explains, “The first question to determine if the facial hair policy can be challenged is this: how is the policy codified?” The answer to this question is somewhat murky, it is a policy that is public knowledge but no one to my knowledge has brought up that it was written in as a rider.

Sheryl continues, “A player who signs with the team with knowledge of the policy probably can’t sue under most circumstances. A player who is traded to the Yankees might have a better case, but still, what is his cause of action?”

However, there is an exception to this: “What if the player is Sikh, Muslim, or a Chasidic Jew? If the company says, ‘no facial hair’ and makes no exceptions for religion, a player would probably have a pretty good case under state and federal law barring discrimination in employment.” In this case, it would be religious discrimination. This is because it is not a Bona Fide Occupational Qualification for playing baseball to be clean-shaven.

“It’s a reasonable accommodation to allow somebody to have a beard, or long hair, for religious purposes so long as it is within reason.” One exception may be if a player’s religion requires that hair never be cut or washed. Then the team would be within reason to say that would be a health hazard.

Sheryl continued, “But a blanket ban on facial hair is probably invalid the instant somebody with a bona fide religious belief contrary to the policy comes along.” What about in a case like the Domino’s case above? “If a player wants to keep his beard because when he shaves, his skin falls off, do the Yankees have to let him keep the beard? Yes! Because it’s a medical condition.”

I still had one question for Sheryl, is there any possibility that this policy could lead to accusations of racial discrimination? No, as she explained, “If your policy is generally applicable, then the policy itself is probably okay.”

However, as with many earlier examples, there are exceptions.

“If for example, there was a race of people who were ten times more likely to wear facial hair, you could reasonably argue that the policy was what is called a proxy, disincentivizing hiring that race by other means.”

The other exception? “Let’s say a couple people of a given race asked for an exception on cultural grounds and the team said no. If the team refuses an accommodation and makes clear the purpose of the policy is to make people appear like a specific race or make them appear less like a specific race, then it is illegal.”

In short, there is a chance that a player could threaten legal action against the Yankees due to their policy. It would have to be in very specific situations such as the ones listed above. The question is if one player acts, will it signal to other players that they too refuse to follow the policy? Given the resistance from Frazier in 2017 and more fans voicing displeasure, we may be closer than we think to see an end to the policy.

Special thanks to Sheryl Ring for answering all my questions, she can be found on Twitter @Ring_Sheryl

Born and raised in New Jersey in a Yankee household, Matt works with computers by day but has always loved baseball. When he's not doing either of those things, he's probably thinking about Villanova basketball way too much. Follow him on Twitter @MattchewGregory.

Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

New York Yankees

Yankees year in review | The starting pitchers

Matt Gregory

Published

on

Kim Klement-USA TODAY Sports

Welcome to Yankees Year in Review. This is the third of four parts looking at each position group for the Yankees. This week, it’s the starting rotation’s turn.

If you had to pick one weakness of the Yankees in 2018, it would have to be the starting rotation. Going into the season, it looked like this:

Luis Severino
Masahiro Tanaka
Sonny Gray
CC Sabathia
Jordan Montgomery

Much like the infield, this is not what the rotation looked like by year’s end. That is not surprising, starting rotations rarely survive a whole year without injuries or poor performance. There was some good and some bad, let’s start with the bad.

The fifth starter was a rotating door, as the Yankees lost Jordan Montgomery after six starts to an elbow strain. That would eventually lead to Tommy John surgery, ending his 2018 and potentially his 2019 season. His initial replacement was Luis Cessa who was also bitten by the injury bug with a hip issue.

Domingo Germán would then get his opportunity to lock down the fifth starter. While he stayed healthy, the results were mixed. Germán has a starter quality pitch mix, the issue was walks and home runs, which kept him from holding onto the spot.

CC Sabathia was a consistent bright spot for the rotation and statistically the third best starter in his age 37 season. It was announced on November 7th that Sabathia signed a one-year contract for 8 million dollars. He also stated that 2019 would be his last season. Sabathia raised his K/9 (strikeouts per nine innings) from 7.26 in 2017 to 8.24 in 2018.

Additionally, he cut down his HR/9 (home runs allowed per nine innings) to 1.12 from 1.27 in 2017.
Getting 2.5 WAR from a 37-year-old back-end starter is impressive and if Sabathia can give the Yankees another 150 innings as he did in 2018, then it would be an undeniable success. One milestone to watch: Sabathia needs 14 strikeouts to reach 3,000 in his career.

That brings us to Sonny Gray. The Yankees dealt James Kaprielian, Jorge Mateo and Dustin Fowler for the righty in 2017 and he performed fine in those 11 starts. His first full season with the Yankees was bad. Gray walked 3.94 batters per nine innings and had an ERA of 4.90. He was sent to the bullpen where he would be used in long relief and an occasional spot start to end the year.

General Manager Brian Cashman has been rather open about his intent to deal Gray, telling Matt Ehalt of the Bergen Record that Gray “has got a good makeup, I just don’t think this is the right spot for him.” Unless he is packaged with some prospects, it seems hard to believe that Gray will bring much of a return in prospects, maybe some lottery ticket type players.

To replace Gray and strengthen the fifth spot, Cashman dealt from the surplus of players and prospects who were blocked for Lance Lynn and J.A. Happ. Both performed as good, if not better than what was expected of them coming over. Lynn was worth 1.8 fWAR in 9 starts while Happ was worth 1.1 fWAR in 11 starts. Both are free agents and potential targets for backend innings. Lynn can also provide extended innings out of the bullpen, something he did both in the regular season and playoffs for the Yankees.

Masahiro Tanaka was not healthy for the full year but still turned in one of his better seasons statistically. He sliced his ERA down by a full run to 3.75 and his HR/9 to 1.44. Still, he only pitched 156 innings. When healthy, he is arguably the second-best starter to Luis Severino in the rotation and will be with the Yankees for another two years since he did not opt-out of his contract.

Speaking of Severino, he started off the year with Cy Young caliber stuff. The problem was that his ERA in the second half was 5.57, which for reference was higher than Sonny Gray’s full-season ERA. Severino has the pure stuff: a high 90s fastball and a wipeout slider. He did not use the changeup much until the second half, but it showed flashes as a good pitch. There is also some evidence that Severino was tipping pitches, specifically in the playoffs. The hope would be that the team caught this, and it gets addressed going into next season.

Still, with Severino, Tanaka, and Sabathia there are two spots left in the rotation. There are three routes the Yankees could choose: internal promotion, free agency, and trades. Internally, the Yankees have Justus Sheffield, Chance Adams, and Jonathan Loaisiga. Adams and Loaisiga both made starts during 2017, while Sheffield made some relief appearances late in the year. Loaisiga performed better than Adams but he also dealt with shoulder issues. Expect all three to compete in Spring training 2019 for a spot.

This free agent class looked impressive for pitching a couple years ago and now, it merely looks okay? Clayton Kershaw was taken off the market by signing an extension with the Dodgers in early November. Hyun-Jin Ryu is rumored to most likely accept the Dodgers’ qualifying offer. So, those are two fewer options.

According to Keith Law (insider paywall), the best pitching options still left are Patrick Corbin, Dallas Keuchel, Charlie Morton and Nathan Eovaldi. Corbin would be an “ace” type acquisition, though he has been injured in the past. Keuchel also has missed some time in 2016 and 2017 but would be a great option as a mid-rotation starter. Morton is on the older side and the Yankees may be wary to sign Eovaldi again, especially with the workload he shouldered coming off Tommy John.

Finally, we come to the trade candidates. James Paxton, Carlos Carrasco, and Corey Kluber have all been rumored to be available so far this offseason as both the Mariners and Indians decide whether they want to shed payroll. Any one of the three would be welcome additions but come with hefty price tags, though it has not stopped Cashman from dealing before.
No matter what, the rotation will be the number one priority this offseason. Expect Cashman to get creative as he addresses the clear weakness of this Yankees team.

Continue Reading

Podcast

Gary Sanchez has shoulder surgery, will be ready Opening Day

Stacey Gotsulias

Published

on

Gary Sanchez
Troy Taormina-USA TODAY Sports

In today’s episode of Locked On Yankees, Stacey discusses Gary Sanchez’s shoulder surgery (try saying that three times fast), Luke Voit’s insane offseason workouts, Brian Cashman’s comments about Chris Sale and she takes you around the league.

Continue Reading

Podcast

CC Sabathia signs one-year deal to stay with the Yankees in 2019

Stacey Gotsulias

Published

on

Brad Penner-USA Today Sports

In today’s episode of Locked On Yankees, Stacey discusses CC Sabathia’s latest one-year deal with the Yankees and she discusses Bryce Harper, Manny Machado, Josh Donaldson and much more!

Continue Reading

Trending